|
|
|
|
The table below is based
on damage resulting from the impact of Cyclone Tracy on Darwin in 1974.
|
Damage
class
|
Worst
damage feature
|
Damage
repair index
|
|
Elevated
houses
|
Low-set
houses
|
One-storey
non-residential buildings
|
Top-floor
of multi-storey buildings
|
|
Brick walls
|
Asbestos cement
walls
|
|
1
|
Negligible
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
2
|
Missile damage to cladding or windows
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
|
3
|
Loss of half roof sheeting
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
|
4
|
Loss of all roof sheeting
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.15
|
0.15
|
0.20
|
|
5
|
Loss of roof structure
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.25
|
|
6
|
Loss of half walls
|
0.50
|
0.65
|
0.60
|
0.60
|
0.55
|
|
7
|
Loss of all walls
|
0.75
|
0.90
|
0.90
|
0.90
|
0.80
|
|
8
|
Loss of half floor
|
0.85
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
9
|
Loss of all floor
|
0.95
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
10
|
Collapse of floor support piers
|
1.00
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
Damage repair index =
cost to repair damage/ initial cost of building
This scale is particularly
applicable to cyclone damage. Henderson et al. [1999] produced a more generalised
version with damage in eight categories [below]
| |
Category
|
Description
|
|
1
|
Negligible/Non-structural
|
Includes damage to elements that are not
part of the main structural framework, such as guttering, soffit lining,
fascias, garage doors and the like
|
|
2
|
Impact
|
Where a house has obviously been impacted
by flying debris, but which has not led to consequential damage. Examples
would be a bent debris screen or indentations of external cladding.
|
|
3
|
Roofing
|
Loss of some roofing, but where battens
and roof structures are left substantially intact. For HC houses roofing
that had peeled back to the overbatten, but not beyond, was included
in this category. This was so even if the edge batten was still attached
to the roofing that had peeled back.
|
|
4
|
Roof battens
|
Failure caused by inadequate fixing of
roof battens to rafters, so roofing and battens were blown off. The
rest of the roof structure is in place.
|
|
5
|
Half-roof
|
A significant portion of the roof structure
has been blown away.
|
|
6
|
All roof
|
All the roof structure would need to be
replaced.
|
|
7
|
Half walls
|
Loss of most of the roof structure and
loss of some walls.
|
|
8
|
All walls
|
Loss of most of the walls and roof structure.
|
References
Henderson D, Reardon G
and Ginger J, 1999, effects of Cyclone Vance on the strength of houses in
Exmouth, W.A., in Disaster Prevention in the 21st Century,
Proceedings of the Australian disaster Conference, 1-3 November 1999, Canberra,
Emergency Management Australia, 47-52.
Leicester R H and Reardon
G F, 1976, A statistical analysis of the structural damage by Cyclone Tracy,
Annual Conference, Institution of Engineers, Australia, Townsville,
242-247.
  
|